Comparing Mesh Types

You have already examined the velocity plot and seen that the numerical solution compares well with the experimental data. Compare the velocity data that is produced on this mesh with that produced on the Hexahedral Mesh and the Tetrahedral Mesh.

First, import the data from the previous two simulations:

  1. Open the Tools node.
  2. Right-click the Tables node and select New Table > File Table.
  3. Select file hex380.csv and click Open.
  4. Do the same to import the data saved in file tet380.csv.

To plot the imported data:

  1. Open the Plots > Velocity Plot at X = 0.38 node.
  2. Right-click the Data Series node and select Add Data.
  3. In the Add Data Providers to Plot dialog, select hex380 and click OK.
  4. Expand the Data Series > hex380 node and set the following properties:
    Node Property Value
    hex380 Legend Name HexMesh
    Sort Plot Data Activated
    Line Style Style Solid
    Symbol Style Shape None
  5. Once again, right-click the Data Series node and select Add Data.
  6. In the Add Data Providers to Plot dialog, select tet380 and click OK.
  7. Select the Data Series > tet380 node and set the following properties:
    Node Property Value
    tet380 Legend Name TetMesh
    Sort Plot Data Activated
    Line Style Style Solid
    Symbol Style Shape None
  8. Expand the Data Series > exp380 node and set the following properties:
    Node Property Value
    exp380 Legend Name Experimental
    Symbol Style Color Black
  9. Expand the Plots > Velocity Plot at X = 0.38 > Y Types > Y Type 1 node and set the following properties:
    Node Property Value
    X=0.38 Legend Name PolyMesh
    Sort Plot Data Activated
    Line Style Style Solid
    Symbol Style Shape None

The plot appears as shown below.

There is little difference in the quality of the results from the three meshes, although the result from the polyhedral mesh is slightly better than the other two in the recirculation zone. The polyhedral mesh has only 60,838 cells. The hexahedral mesh has 67,699 cells and the tetrahedral mesh has 140,141 cells. The analysis on the polyhedral mesh only required 121 iterations to reach convergence which compares to 221 for the hexahedral mesh and 181 for the tetrahedral mesh. The results therefore demonstrate the ability of polyhedral meshes to produce good quality results with lower cell counts and shorter run times than other mesh types.

  1. Save the simulation.