Deicing

Deicing is assumed to be a quasi-steady process.

An ice layer at temperature Tice is melted with a wall heat flux q, of which a proportion Cemp is absorbed in the ice layer. Melted ice at the freezing temperature TF escapes as run-off which cannot refreeze in the current model. The mass and energy fluxes that are associated with this process are illustrated in the diagram below:



The mass balance for the deicing process is simply

Figure 1. EQUATION_DISPLAY
m˙melt=m˙run-off
(214)

As it is assumed that run-off cannot refreeze, there is the additional constraint that m˙run-off0 and hence from Eqn. (214), m˙melt0.

The energy balance for this process, neglecting the kinetic energy that is associated with the mass fluxes, is:

Figure 2. EQUATION_DISPLAY
m˙melths(Tice)+q=m˙run-offhL(TF)+(1-Cemp)q
(215)

where hs(Tice) is the enthalpy of the solid ice at the temperature of the ice layer, and hL(TF) is the enthalpy that is associated with the melting ice at the freezing temperature. These enthalpies are related to temperature by:

Figure 3. EQUATION_DISPLAY
hs(T)=Cp,sT
(216)
Figure 4. EQUATION_DISPLAY
hL(T)=Cp,sT+L
(217)

Using these relations with the mass balance, and rearranging, gives an explicit expression for the melting rate:

Figure 5. EQUATION_DISPLAY
m˙melt=CempqCp,s(TF-Tice)+L
(218)

The constraint, m˙melt0, must be imposed on this equation. If Eqn. (218) predicts a negative m˙melt, it is clipped to zero.

Given m˙melt, the ice thickness, s, can be updated using:

Figure 6. EQUATION_DISPLAY
dsdt=-m˙meltρs
(219)

where ρs is the density of the ice layer.

Accretion

The preceding analysis is extended to include an additional incident mass flux of liquid droplets, each with mass md, temperature Td and velocity vd. This expression is intended to represent liquid droplets impinging on the surface. The various contributions to the overall energy balance are depicted below:



In the above diagram, As,b is the surface area of the boundary face onto which the droplets impinge and Δt is the time-step. The term:

md[hL(Td)+12vd2]As,bΔt

indicates the overall energy flux due to the impinging droplets.

The mass balance is therefore given as:

Figure 7. EQUATION_DISPLAY
m˙melt+m˙d=m˙run-off
(220)

where:

Figure 8. EQUATION_DISPLAY
m˙d=mdAs,bΔt
(221)

In addition to the constraint that m˙run-off0, there is also m˙d0. The constraint on m˙melt is now m˙melt-m˙d, that is, freezing is allowed but no faster than the incoming liquid rate.

The energy balance for this process is:

Figure 9. EQUATION_DISPLAY
m˙melths(Tice)+md[hL(Td)+12vd2]As,bΔt+q=(1Cemp)q+m˙runoffhL(TF)
(222)

giving:

Figure 10. EQUATION_DISPLAY
m˙melt=Cempq+md[Cp,s(TdTF)+12vd2]As,bΔtCp,s(TFTice)+L
(223)

A similar analysis can be made for the accretion of solid particles.

Accretion Ratio

Following Makkonen [195], it is useful to define the accretion ratio for non-zero m˙d as:

Figure 11. EQUATION_DISPLAY
α=-m˙meltm˙d
(224)

This quantity characterizes the nature of the accretion process. When α=1 there is no run-off and the accretion is “dry”, which tends to form rime ice. Otherwise there is some run-off, and the “wet” growth tends to form glaze ice. The accretion ratio is sometimes also known as the “freezing fraction”.